Time to get back to my gal for a little chat, I was gonna say ๐
Over the past few days I have posted on MetArt lengthy impressions of 4 of Kristel's MetArt sets, written and posted originally on MET in 2013 and 2014. Only one of those "reviews" has not been deleted. The reason given for this is that they contain words or ideas prohibited in MetArt member comments. Any word, suggestion or allusion pertaining to someone under the age of 18 and the comment is likely to be censored. "Likely", because some have been allowed to stand, intentionally or not.
What's funny about this is that Kristel in her MET bio says she sometimes feels like a little girl. If she said that as a MET subscriber, she would be immediately censored.
Why does MET have such a problem with ordinary innocent words about being human? MET comments-moderator and censor Rose blames recent American laws cracking down on sexual trafficking and child pornography. When you look at MET's cover page these days, you can almost see why it fears trouble. Its models are verified to be at least 18, but all the other girls it's selling? Who knows?
The upshot is that this "premier" adult site can't risk letting adult subscribers speak as adults. Everybody has to fear the censor and most censor themselves. This usually makes for very bland and predictable commentary, spiced with plenty of sophomoric lewdness, which MET has no problem with, and even seems to encourage.
So sorry sweetheart. I'm still gonna try to republish those and other impressions of your sets, which try to discover, describe and appreciate your specialness. Sometimes they're critical, but they're always motivated by love and enchantment ๐ โฏ๏ธ
Footnote to MetArt's apparent double standard on age-related comments: it published a movie on Nov 29, 2020 called Schoolgirl on Vacation. Of course this schoolgirl was in college and at least 18. You can look it up!
Gotta be tuff for 'em becuz their business is selling nude imagery of women as young as 18. Still adolescent, not far from childhood. So its editors are like the little Dutch boy running out of fingers to plug the dike with (no pun intended :-) And they don't care how foolish they look, because they are MET.
Do as we say, not as we do ๐โ๏ธ๐
Did I mention the galling airbrushing on the cover of Just Nude? Probably ๐
Have to wonder who they thought they were appealing to.
There are some very nice shots in that gallery, particularly of her face and upper body. She's very elegant.
I wanted to juxtapose that pic with one of her Rylsky shots. Too bad it was wrecked.
Interesting that Kristel isn't featured on Love Hairy according to this site. I thought I saw a MET promo that showed she was. I don't know if she is or isn't, but I don't blame her if she asked you not include Love Hairy on her "model pages." I think of Love Hairy as a ghetto, partly because of its name. I imagine Kristel thinks of her "unshaven" self as more than just hairy.
Ya can't beat Kristel's beauty. It's the harmony, inside and out, that makes it special. I'm talking about her best pictures, which number in the hundreds. She posed at a prime time for this kind of modeling, yet her face has a timeless quality. She's fresh, girlish yet womanly. Innocent yet also knowing, like the combination of her shaven and unshaven sets. Is there any other erotica model that shows this dramatic complexity?
I'm a critic of mainstream erotica such as MetArt and Femjoy. Not only because of the boring conformity but also because the quality of current models I see has dropped drastically over the past several years. If the industry is having trouble surviving financially, it's no wonder.
I say this because, tho I despise the usual offerings of MET and FJ, and wince at the updates of a satellite site such as Stunning 18, buried in there somewhere is a model I love. This is why I'm a vocal critic: I have seen how great a product this industry can produce. Or could produce, in days gone by.
Will it ever produce something special again? I don't think so, not in the foreseeable future. It would have to become something other than what it has become. It would have to appeal to genuinely attractive and sexy young women. It lacks them now, and the more this lack persists, the more it will grow. Beauties do not want to be associated with porn, the kind of stuff MET and FJ churn out, and expect people to pay for. Low standards are this industry's friend; they don't call it the oldest profession for nothing. So it will survive in some way, and the webmasters know this. What I think they do fear is a demand for higher quality. Thus the corner they've painted themselves into.
As sweet as Kristel is, even she shows how much better a young woman is with hair, the natural stuff on her body, rather than when her body is denuded of it, denatured. It's still hard for me to fathom how someone can prefer for example an unnaturally bald pubic area, aka pubes, to one lush with sensual fur. But in this industry, "glam" in particular, bald is where it's at. Even guy models are bald down there. It looks ridiculous to me, absurd, but I guess keeping hair out of a sucker's mouth is priority numero uno.
I will agree that when it comes to being fashionably clothed, certain parts of a person are suitably shaven. But in erotica, porn, what counts more, at least to me, is the person's, the woman's, unclothed body. And when I see an erotica performer apparently trying to make their body as hair-free as a child's, you know one big reason I do not subscribe to "glam."
Could say a lot more about what's wrong with glam and the porn industry generally; I'll save it for another time โ๏ธ๐ธ
Comments
Time to get back to my gal for a little chat, I was gonna say ๐
Over the past few days I have posted on MetArt lengthy impressions of 4 of Kristel's MetArt sets, written and posted originally on MET in 2013 and 2014. Only one of those "reviews" has not been deleted. The reason given for this is that they contain words or ideas prohibited in MetArt member comments. Any word, suggestion or allusion pertaining to someone under the age of 18 and the comment is likely to be censored. "Likely", because some have been allowed to stand, intentionally or not.
What's funny about this is that Kristel in her MET bio says she sometimes feels like a little girl. If she said that as a MET subscriber, she would be immediately censored.
Why does MET have such a problem with ordinary innocent words about being human? MET comments-moderator and censor Rose blames recent American laws cracking down on sexual trafficking and child pornography. When you look at MET's cover page these days, you can almost see why it fears trouble. Its models are verified to be at least 18, but all the other girls it's selling? Who knows?
The upshot is that this "premier" adult site can't risk letting adult subscribers speak as adults. Everybody has to fear the censor and most censor themselves. This usually makes for very bland and predictable commentary, spiced with plenty of sophomoric lewdness, which MET has no problem with, and even seems to encourage.
So sorry sweetheart. I'm still gonna try to republish those and other impressions of your sets, which try to discover, describe and appreciate your specialness. Sometimes they're critical, but they're always motivated by love and enchantment ๐ โฏ๏ธ
Footnote to MetArt's apparent double standard on age-related comments: it published a movie on Nov 29, 2020 called Schoolgirl on Vacation. Of course this schoolgirl was in college and at least 18. You can look it up!
Gotta be tuff for 'em becuz their business is selling nude imagery of women as young as 18. Still adolescent, not far from childhood. So its editors are like the little Dutch boy running out of fingers to plug the dike with (no pun intended :-) And they don't care how foolish they look, because they are MET.
Do as we say, not as we do ๐โ๏ธ๐
Did I mention the galling airbrushing on the cover of Just Nude? Probably ๐
Have to wonder who they thought they were appealing to.
There are some very nice shots in that gallery, particularly of her face and upper body. She's very elegant.
I wanted to juxtapose that pic with one of her Rylsky shots. Too bad it was wrecked.
Interesting that Kristel isn't featured on Love Hairy according to this site. I thought I saw a MET promo that showed she was. I don't know if she is or isn't, but I don't blame her if she asked you not include Love Hairy on her "model pages." I think of Love Hairy as a ghetto, partly because of its name. I imagine Kristel thinks of her "unshaven" self as more than just hairy.
Ya can't beat Kristel's beauty. It's the harmony, inside and out, that makes it special. I'm talking about her best pictures, which number in the hundreds. She posed at a prime time for this kind of modeling, yet her face has a timeless quality. She's fresh, girlish yet womanly. Innocent yet also knowing, like the combination of her shaven and unshaven sets. Is there any other erotica model that shows this dramatic complexity?
Kristel: unspoilt (see Stoa 0017 :-) Denatured glam-erotica models: equivalent to junk food that fails to satisfy ๐ฅค๐ฉ ๐ซ
I'm a critic of mainstream erotica such as MetArt and Femjoy. Not only because of the boring conformity but also because the quality of current models I see has dropped drastically over the past several years. If the industry is having trouble surviving financially, it's no wonder.
I say this because, tho I despise the usual offerings of MET and FJ, and wince at the updates of a satellite site such as Stunning 18, buried in there somewhere is a model I love. This is why I'm a vocal critic: I have seen how great a product this industry can produce. Or could produce, in days gone by.
Will it ever produce something special again? I don't think so, not in the foreseeable future. It would have to become something other than what it has become. It would have to appeal to genuinely attractive and sexy young women. It lacks them now, and the more this lack persists, the more it will grow. Beauties do not want to be associated with porn, the kind of stuff MET and FJ churn out, and expect people to pay for. Low standards are this industry's friend; they don't call it the oldest profession for nothing. So it will survive in some way, and the webmasters know this. What I think they do fear is a demand for higher quality. Thus the corner they've painted themselves into.
As sweet as Kristel is, even she shows how much better a young woman is with hair, the natural stuff on her body, rather than when her body is denuded of it, denatured. It's still hard for me to fathom how someone can prefer for example an unnaturally bald pubic area, aka pubes, to one lush with sensual fur. But in this industry, "glam" in particular, bald is where it's at. Even guy models are bald down there. It looks ridiculous to me, absurd, but I guess keeping hair out of a sucker's mouth is priority numero uno.
I will agree that when it comes to being fashionably clothed, certain parts of a person are suitably shaven. But in erotica, porn, what counts more, at least to me, is the person's, the woman's, unclothed body. And when I see an erotica performer apparently trying to make their body as hair-free as a child's, you know one big reason I do not subscribe to "glam."
Could say a lot more about what's wrong with glam and the porn industry generally; I'll save it for another time โ๏ธ๐ธ