She has interesting nipples. I feel like her nipples look a lot like girls in vintage pics do, as if you don’t see nipples like she has much anymore s genetically speaking t must be a shrinking trait now rare.
I did read the FAQ a couple of weeks ago, which did a nice job of retaining the mystery :-)
At least your site puts a time frame around the current rank. But it still seems arbitrary and in service to big sites like Met.
At worst such rankings are a slap in the face to models. Others are in my view clearly overrated, often simply because they are "new".
We're still in the i-porn Dark Ages! ☯
Comments
https://www.indexxx.com/models/148833/dakota-6/
https://www.metart.com/model/dakota/
http://www.lovehairy.com/model/dakota
She has interesting nipples. I feel like her nipples look a lot like girls in vintage pics do, as if you don’t see nipples like she has much anymore s genetically speaking t must be a shrinking trait now rare.
40 -- the default rank for current Met models?
This time I will put it as a question :-))
I don't know how it's calculated - did you read the FAQ? (:R
I did read the FAQ a couple of weeks ago, which did a nice job of retaining the mystery :-)
At least your site puts a time frame around the current rank. But it still seems arbitrary and in service to big sites like Met.
At worst such rankings are a slap in the face to models. Others are in my view clearly overrated, often simply because they are "new".
We're still in the i-porn Dark Ages! ☯
https://www.freeones.com/html/d_links/Dakota_Babe/
https://www.elitebabes.com/model/dakota/
Dakota at Met-Art
http://fhg.met-art.com/2019-04-04/RAPUNZEL/?pa=1888678
Dakota at Met-Art
http://access.met-art.com/track/4240.MA.1.2.5.148612.0/
Given the length and colour of her hair it would seem likely that all her sets to date were shot around the same time.
DOB: 6/1/1996
I miss this adorable lady.